FREE ENERGY - By Prof. Dr. P.T. PAPPAS

FREE ENERGY - THE GREATEST AND SIMPLEST PROOF OF MY LIFE

               The result of the above TV tube (or Cathode Ray tube) is the final speed of an electron is bigger than its initial speed:  U final > U_X initial     which  can enter into another tube like this one; at point A, following   the original direction of  U_X and similarly. into another such tube and so on...  Finally redirected in to the first one at point A with the same direction as the original of  U_X, U reaching as much exponentially high values of free energy, towards infinity and self destruction, as with every other perpetual mobile happens, and without any relevant consumption of energy......
This example proves the principle of creation with tremendous economic and social implications, when a limiter is applied to avoid infinity and self-destruction. .

IMPROVED VERSION     click₁ here  for correcting the right end effect and click₂  here for answering several invited suggestions

FIRST POSTED AND PUBLISHED WORLD WIDE BY THE AUTHOR ON 20/3/2010
P.T.P

NON CONSERVATION OF ENERGY-PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUOUS CREATION OF ENERGY- IN CONFORMITY OF THE GENERAL PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUOUS CREATION-see below (selection column) 

USUALLY INCREASING - CREATING ENERGY         

ENERGY PRODUCING SIMILAR ENERGY  See relevant topics in the selection column

Standard TV Cathode or Oscilloscope tube with only one vertical diversion electrodes, electrostatically charged, assuming well insulated, without any leakage, provision is made for U_x is big enough or most important, the distance between the electrodes of vertical diversion, so that no electrons reach the upper positive plate.

Assuming, though we doubt very much that the passing electron through the whole of the anode, has paid its energy ticket, the velocity U_x at is determined as the accelerated velocity according to the potential difference between cathode and anode, without consuming any energy from the potential difference. We clearly claim that the vertical gained there velocity   U_{Y is also totally  unjustified. Below we prove this last statement.
The total kinetic energy  of the passing  electron through is therefore E = 1/2 mU}²  = 1/2mU_X^{2  +1/2m U}_Y^{2 . .with}  _U^2=U_X^{2 + U}_Y^{2 . and U .> U}_X

_{Which is the initial velocity after the electron passed the anode at point A and nothing is consumed there by this passing there.}
 

^{The energy 1/2m U}_Y² is a created new energy- as free energy of the system This amount of energy can be repeated for as many electrons we can wait for,
                                                    click here, for seeing the diagram of repeating gaining free energy electron
 and without any corresponding energy consumption. The principle of conservation of energy is not generally valid. Energy is not always conserved. See also PAPIMI  as at least 120% over unity device, here. below (selection column). The above configuration is a miniature accelerator compared to  CERN accelerator. However, what we are concerned is the relevant understanding of the people there about non conservation of energy or energy continuous creation or energy's possibility of increase to selfdistruction that these people did not expect.

The Principle of leas/t action for the above system for the Theoretical Phycist, CERN Scientist and any  other relevant Professional.

The principle of least action is considered as the most advanced method in  Theoretical .Physics in this case. However, for conservation of energy, the symmetry with respect to time is required  However, as we have already shown in an elementary way, there is no symmetry in time for the energy increases with time So one of the basic requirements of this Principle is not fulfilled in this case. Tautologically, therefore, the Principle of least action is trivial here and can not offer more than we have shown for the non conservation of energy of the above system.

If we are wrong, 100000 Euros reward for the first claimer, as it is offered in other places in this site. None has self made a claim today 30/10/2011 morning yet! We receive only supporting messages.

NEWER CONSIDERATION: THE ABOVE SUSPENSION IS CANCELLED 24 HOURS AFTER ITS ACTIVATION. NOTE:: THE SUSPENSION WAS FIRST IMPOSED TO ALLOW TIME FOR THE CORRECTNESS OF AN ARGUMENT, PRODUCED AN INVITED FELLOW PROFESSOR FROM A NORTHERN UNIVERSITY. THE ARGUMENT WAS FOUND INCORRECT

In case you have made a claim  or to confirm your claim or because it was lost, please call personally Pro.PT Pappas at  code +30210. office number 9270807, Home number 9012028, Fax +302109011620 or mobile or cell phone, code + 30, number  6944338415, e-mail ppappas@papimi.gr, local time +2 hours GMT (Greenwich Mean Time) or +3 hours GMT  taking into account the silly summer time, in case,  it is applicable..+ international code as defined by the calling country, 30 code for Greece, 210 code for the city of Athens. Ordinary postal address  is not given for security reasons. VALID CONTACTS ARE THOSE GIVEN HERE BY PHONE ,FAX, AND E-MAIL.
SOME PEOPLE, NOT DARING TO CONTACT US PROPERLY. THEY ARE BLUFFING TO CREATE WRONG IMPRESSIONS BY HIDING FROM US THEIR ALLEGED OBJECTIONS. . 
LANGUAGE OF CONTACT SHOULD BE GREEK OR ENGLISH
with the power of logic

Prof. Dr. P.T. PAPPAS

NOTE1: Claimers should contact us. See contacts in the front page. None has made a  claim, today

NOTE 2: Claimers should make their claims on the current accepted physical laws taught at generally recognized Universities except the principle of conservation Energy which is shown here generally not correct..

NOTE 3 Do not hesitate to claim, nothing to lose, nothing to pay!  All correspondence will be posted here. None has self  made a claim oyet, morning

30/10/2011,  neither by e-mail or directly by phone or Fax. We receive only supporting messages.

NEWER CONSIDERATION: THE ABOVE SUSPENSION IS CANCELLED 24 HOURS AFTER ITS ACTIVATION. NOTE:: THE 1SUSPENSION WAS FIRST IMPOSED TO ALLOW TIME FOR THE CORRECTNESS OF AN ARGUMENT, PRODUCED AN INVITED FELLOW PROFESSOR FROM A NORTHERN UNIVERSITY. THE ARGUMENT WAS FOUND INCORRECT

A  Second independent proof will be added here soon.......FOR THE PROOF SEE BELOW.

Dedicated to the late Stefan Marinov and Leon Dragone who were dedicated in all their short lifes to perpetual mobile. I wish they were with us to know the above indisputable example.

with the power of logic

PTP

Notice 0, The left or entering electron end effect is always accelerating, favoring our conclusions and results for the creation or excess energy.

 MATHEMATICAL PROOF BASED ON VARIATIONAL TECHNIQUES

   

The electric field of two opposite charges Ntice the corespondin end effects is relative very curved.

The electrical field of two elongated distributed opposite charges by a distance x, Notice the corresponding end effect is lessened with respect to the above end effects The radius of curvature of the end effects is shorterer the shorter is the radius of curvature compared the capacitor below. This a very important element here.

Similarly, the electric field of two elongated distributed charges, capacitor distributions. The length of distribution here is x +Δx. Notice the slight variation and inwards smoothening of the end effects lessened  by a second and higher order but definite amount  of magnitude. The longer is the capacitor by Δx the bigger is the radius of curvature at the end effects. Thi is a very key element here to prove, beyond any doubt, the non conservation of energy or better the  creation of energy and  from this creation of universe. See text.

Thus, checking the electrical lines in  reality in a charged capacitor, the end effect of the capacitor is lessened the longer the capacitor is!

The end effect of the lines is obvious at the two ends of the capacitor. The higher position is the exit of the electron, the higher is the horizontal draw back on the electron. However, if we assume the capacitor becomes a little longer by an amount Δx  The end effect of this lethening will be only secondary (second order or higher and of the opposite sign) to Δx .However the vertical gained velocity upwards of the electron will be inverse proportional to the first order of Δx . This is  a contradiction and excludes the fact the end effect of the electric field will compensates the extra energy gained by the electron. This proves that THE END EFFECT  WILL NOT MAKE THE ENERGY TO BE CONSERVED AS IT ASSUMED IN CLASSICAL PHYSICS. Q.E.D

PTP


Source : http://papimi.gr/osc.htm

http://papimiuk.blogspot.com

THE PROOF OF FORCE LAW OF THE HIDDEN LAW OF AMPERE BY THE TRANSISTORS

IN THE OLDEST AND NEWER THEORY OF TRANSISTORS, THIS COMPONENT IS GIVEN WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIPTION AND WORKING DIAGRAM. TWO P CONTACTS ARE ATTACHED TO AN N PLATE MATERIAL. THE TWO CONTACTS ARE UNEQUAL THIS FACT IS NOT EXPLAINED IN BOOKS. APPARENTLY IT WAS FOND THAT THE PNP TRANSISTOR WAS WORKING MUCH BETTER LIKE THIS. SO THE EXPLANATION IS MISSING IN THE OLDER BOOKS UNTIL TODAY. THE WORKING PRINCIPLE OF THE TRANSISTOR IS ATTEMPTED TO BE EXPLAINED BY THE PROCESS OF DIFFUSION. ELECTRONS PRESUMABLY, PASSING THE CATHODE MOTIVATED BY THE BASE, ARE DIFFUSED TO THE COLLECTOR. T O  THE COLLECTOR. THIS AN NAIVE CLAIM. IT DOES NOT EXPLAIN AT ALLWHY THE COLLECTOR IS NOT EQUIVALENT TO THE EMITTER AND WHY THE CONTACT OF A EMITTER TO THE BASE SHOULD BE SMALLER THAN THE CONTACT OF COLLECTOR TO THE SAME BASE.

 

THE EXPLANATION FOR THE SAID DIFFERENCE IN TERMS WITH THE AMPERE FORCE LAW IS AS FOLLOWS: THE CURRENT PASSING, THE CATHODE IS REPELLED ACCORDING TO THIS LOW ALONG TO THE FORWARD DIRECTION WHICH MAKES IT TO REACH THE COLLECTOR. THE VERY FACT THAT THE DENSER IS THIS CURRENT BY THE NARROWER CATHODE THE HIGHEST ARE THE REPELLING FORCES. THUS MAKING THE CONTACT OF THE ENTERING CURRENT BY NARROWING THE EMITTER, WE INCREASE THE PERFORMANCE OF THE TRANSISTOR, BY REACHING THE COLLECTOR EASIER. THOUGH BY MAKING THE OPPOSITE GEOMETRY WE DESTROY THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS TRANSISTOR. SO THE APPLICABILITY OF AMPERE LOW EXPLAINS THE DYNANICS AND THE CHOSEN GEOMETRY OF TRANSISTORS. THE FORCE LOW OF AMPERE IS EQUIVALENT TO THE LORENTZ LOW IN MANY CASES AND FOR THOSE CASES THE TWO LOWS ARE NOT EQUIVALENT, THE AMPERE LOW IS THE ONLY VALID.

IT REMAINS TO BE EXPLAINED WHY THIS LOW  HAS DISAPPEARED FROM THE TAUGHT ELECTRODYNAMICS AND PHYSICS. ARE THERE SOME STRATEGIC AND UNKNOWN CONSEQUENCES OF THIS LOW?:. THE ANSWER OF THIS QUESTION IS YES. HOWEVER. WE SHALL SEE THE HIDDEN CONSEQUENCE IN THE FUTURE....

CONTINUOUS....

Source: http://www.papimi.gr/transistors.htm

http://papimiuk.blogspot.com

6TH, 7TH AND 8TH EXAMPLE OF ENERGY CREATION COMING FROM ELECTROMAGNETISM

INTRODUCTION
ALL 6,7 AND 8TH CONFIGURATION HAVE THE SAME CHARGED NEGATIVELY CATHODE. THE SAME GROUNDED ANODE WITH THE SAME HOLE TO ALLOW PASSAGE OF THE REPELLED ELECTRONS.
CONFIGURATION 6 IS EQUIPPED WITH A NEGATIVELY AND ELECTROSTATICALLY CHARGED RING AS CLOSELY AS POSSIBLY TO THE ANODE AND ON THE RIGHT HAND SIDE.

 THE ELECTRONS IN CONFIGURATION 6 AS SOON AS, THEY PASS THE HOLE OF THE ANODE , THEY ARE BEING REPELLED BY THE ELECTROSTATICALLY CHARGED RING, AWAY FROM IT. THUS INCREASING THEIR HORIZONTAL VELOCITY AND TOTAL ENERGY WITHOUT TO HAVE TO PAY ANY EXTRA POTENTIAL ENERGY TO HAVE TO CROSS THE HOLE.

CALCULATION OF GAINED FOR FREE ENERGY TO AVERY AWAY POINT, WHERE THE FIELD IS ZERO = to the first approximation, ignoring induced charges on the anode (second order approximation)=
= E = Q/R
WHERE R IS THE RADIUS OF THE RING, AND Q IS THE TOTAL CHARGE ON THE RING.

CONFIGURATION 7 PRESUMABLY HAS A LITTLE CHARGED NEGATIVELY SPHERE ON THE RIGHT OF THE ANODE, REPRESENTING A NEGATIVE POINT CHARGE. THE POINT NEGATIVE CHARGE ACTS THE SAME WAY AS THE NEGATIVE RING OF CONFIGURATION 6, THUS INCREASING THE HORIZONTAL AND TOTAL ENERGY WITHOUT THE LOSS OF ANY CHARGE ON THE RIGHT OR ENERGY

QUANTITATIVE CALCULATION OF INCREASED ENERGY.

SUPPOSE THE POTENTIAL OF THE POINT CHARGE AT THE ENTRY POINT IS q/r₁

WHERE q IS THE CHARGE ON THE SMALL SPHERE-POINT CHARGE AND r₁ IS THE DISTANCE OF POINT CHARGE TO THE HOLE.

THE POTENTIAL AT A FAR AWAY POINT IS. q/r_2.  THEN THE GAINED ENERGY IS:

THE GAINED ENERGY PER PASSING ELECTRON AT A FAR AWAY POINT OF DISTANCE r₂
 = to the first approximation, ignoring induced charges on the anode (second order approximation)=
E = (q/r₁  - q/r₂)xe 

WHERE e IS THE CHARGE OF THE PASSING ELECTRON.

CONFIGURATION 8 CONSISTS OF THE SAME ANODE AND CATHODE. ON THE RIGHT OF THE ANODE IT IS EQUIPPED WITH A NUTRAL ISOLATED PLATE. AS SOON THE ELECTRON PASSES OVER THE NUTRAL PLATE OPPOSITE ELECTROSTATIC CHARGES ARE INDUCED THERE, WHICH ATTRACT THE ELECTRON. THUS THE ELECTRON GAIN VERTICAL VELOCITY BY THIS ATTRACTION AS SMALL NEUTRAL PARTICLES ARE ATTRACTED BY A CHARGED BODY AS LONG AS THE ELECTRON COMES AWAY  FROM THE PLATE THE ECTROSTATIC INDUCTION BECOMES WEAKER. THUS REDUCING THE HOLDING BACK VELOCITY.
THUS THE GAINED OVER ALL VELOCITY AND ENERGY IS BIGGER.

CONCLUSION

WHAT IS CHARACTERISTIC IN THE 3 EXAMPLE CONSISTING OF THREE DIFFERENT OBJECTS:

ONE CHARGED NEGATIVELY RING,

ONE CHARGED NEGATIVELY SMALL BALL, POINT CHARGE,

ONE CHARGED   NEGATIVELY PLATE.

IT IS THE NON SYMMETRY ON THE LEFT AND RIGHT HAND SIDE.

ON THE LEFT THERE IS A GROUNDED ANODE WITH A SMALL HOLE, WHICH ANODE  ACTS AS A FARADAY SHIELD FOR THE COMING ELECTRON. SO THE NEEDED APPROACHING  SPENT ENERGY TO THESE OBJECTS IS MUCH LESS THAN THE DESCENDING  GAINED ENERGY.

Cathode and anode are both grounded to zero potential. An electron with kinetic energy received by the heated cathode approaches the neutral anode. There on the anode, by induction, opposite positive charges, are accumulated, which attract and accelerate the electron. The electron passes the new hole again, which a negative concetretic negative ring is placed, as shown. The negative ring repells and farther accelerates the electron to the right towards the next anode. The whole process is repeated, increasing the velocity of the electron, farther and farther,..., making U_0, <U_1., < U_2,< U₃   .....

Source: http://www.papimi.gr/678.htm

http://papimiuk.blogspot.com

IMPROVED EXAMPLE EASIER TO UNDERSTAND ENERGY CREATION

This is an improved mode to understand energy creation or energy increase. All the positive potentials have been changed to zero. The plates of vertical displacement have move towards the anode as closely as possible. Then the passing electron is only repelled and is always accelerating. HOWEVER THE ELECTRON SPENT ENERGY UP TO THE ANODE, AFTER PASSING THE ONLY GAINS ENERGY FOR FREE AS THERE NO CONSUMPTION AFTER THIS POINT!!!!!!!!!!!!
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The anode is at zero potential as we said and it is very well  known from electronics applications it acts also as an Faraday shield for the fields behind it.(For those who are mean I MIGHT MAKE THIS ANODE TO BE A COMPLETE CLOSED SURFACE BY CLOSING IT FROM THE LEFT END, MAKING IT A COMPLETE CLOSED FARADAY CAGE WITH A LITTLE HOLE ON THE RIGHT, ENCLOSING THE CATHODE . NOTHING WILL BE CHANGED !). Unless the little hole makes all the creation of energy !. Let me know by contacting me ppappas@papimi.com etc phones, and FAX.. I may publish your point unanimously with my answer together.
Notice also i₁ = 0, i₂ < i₃     i₃ - i₂  corresponds to the passing electrons. only. Typical value for this current 200 mA. It may go up to 2A or more. This current may charge or discharge the capacitor plates in less than 1 nanosecond. These values are given to show to an invited and objecting University professor, that a relative small energy system such as the horizontal capacitor's 1/2CV²  may divert the huge relative energy of the passing electrons VIt= 5000voltx2AXt

NUMERICAL EXAMPLE with typical  (reasonable)  values.
In the following we shall use only definitions and Mathematical identities that are always  and under any circumstances valid

Such as
Energy = mechanical work by definition = int(Fds)=int(m_edu/dt)(ds)=int{m_eudu}= 1/2m_eu²

Energy = electrical work by definition = eE, E = Electromotive Force (Voltage), using the better terminology of older Electrodynamics
(KOSTA) Remember that q on a conductive surface or a conductor is a function -distribution,  not a constant. Also that, the E.M.F. on a conductor or a surface is zero, so no matter whatever the charge distribution is on it, the conductor or the metallic surface remains always equi-potential that determines the electric field outside and near it!

therefore eV = 1/2m_ev²   therefore

v = (2eV/m_e)^1/2 = (2x 5x10³x1,602 X 10^-12 10^-8Joules / 9,109 x 10^-28 x 10^-3 Kgr)^1/2 = (1,7587x10¹⁴)^1/2  = 1,326X10⁷ meters/ seconds in non relativistic mechanics. So  for relativistic mechanics, the passing velocity is close to the velocity of light. Approximately:         v= 98% C  VELOCITY OF LIGHT

mass to electron charge m_e/ e = 1/(5.2727x 10¹⁷ ESU x gr^-1)
 5000eV =5000eE = 5x10³x1,602 X 10^-12 erg= 5x10³x1,602 X 10^-12 10^-8Joules

m_e =9,109 x 10^-28 g r= 9,e109 x 10^-28 x 10^-3 Kgr

distance cathode to the anode = irrelevant however with higher order corrections due to the small hole, which tends to zero, the bigger this distance, we choose.

Homogeneous Intensity of field between the plates of big capacitor  = V/L= -200Volts/1cm=-20000Volts/ meter

L = 1 cm separation = 0,01meters

V = -200 VOLT

E = Electromotive force of the cathode = -5000 Volts

Length of the capacitor  S= 300 cm= 3 meters

Width of the capacitor = 40 cm= 0,4 meter

time travel between the plates = t=S /v= 3 Meters/30000000 m/sec =3/3x10^-8seconds = approximately 10 nanoseconds.

                                            t   time passing through the capacitor =  approximately 10 nanoseconds
 

The passing short time is short and it will correspond to a practical small increase in the vertical velocity and due, to the electron's high rapidness of descending from the capacitor with a great velocity, the electron results also to a practical small increase in the horizontal velocity. Therefore for this realistic and reasonable example we have a small but definite increase in the over all velocity and energy.
Therefore this definite but in practice small increase of velocity and corresponding energy explains why experimentally energy was not known to increase.

Improving factors for making the energy increase bigger are to minimize the cathode| to the anode potential difference down to less even than 50 Volts, even down to -15volts (cut off negative anode potential), letting even thermal electronss through, to increase the capacitor length to 30 meters or more, to increase the potential of the capacitor plate to even 5000 or more and finally to decrease the diameter of the hole which what ever small it will be, still (thermal) electrons will go through it even without any cathode to anode potential,.    Q.E.D.

Matters like the self degreasing system's entropy will be published on another occasion elsewhere

Source : http://www.papimi.gr/IMPROVED.htm

http://papimiuk.blogspot.com