IN THE OLDEST AND NEWER THEORY OF TRANSISTORS, THIS COMPONENT IS GIVEN WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIPTION AND WORKING DIAGRAM. TWO P CONTACTS ARE ATTACHED TO AN N PLATE MATERIAL. THE TWO CONTACTS ARE UNEQUAL THIS FACT IS NOT EXPLAINED IN BOOKS. APPARENTLY IT WAS FOND THAT THE PNP TRANSISTOR WAS WORKING MUCH BETTER LIKE THIS. SO THE EXPLANATION IS MISSING IN THE OLDER BOOKS UNTIL TODAY. THE WORKING PRINCIPLE OF THE TRANSISTOR IS ATTEMPTED TO BE EXPLAINED BY THE PROCESS OF DIFFUSION. ELECTRONS PRESUMABLY, PASSING THE CATHODE MOTIVATED BY THE BASE, ARE DIFFUSED TO THE COLLECTOR. T O THE COLLECTOR. THIS AN NAIVE CLAIM. IT DOES NOT EXPLAIN AT ALLWHY THE COLLECTOR IS NOT EQUIVALENT TO THE EMITTER AND WHY THE CONTACT OF A EMITTER TO THE BASE SHOULD BE SMALLER THAN THE CONTACT OF COLLECTOR TO THE SAME BASE.
THE EXPLANATION FOR THE SAID DIFFERENCE IN TERMS WITH THE AMPERE FORCE LAW IS AS FOLLOWS: THE CURRENT PASSING, THE CATHODE IS REPELLED ACCORDING TO THIS LOW ALONG TO THE FORWARD DIRECTION WHICH MAKES IT TO REACH THE COLLECTOR. THE VERY FACT THAT THE DENSER IS THIS CURRENT BY THE NARROWER CATHODE THE HIGHEST ARE THE REPELLING FORCES. THUS MAKING THE CONTACT OF THE ENTERING CURRENT BY NARROWING THE EMITTER, WE INCREASE THE PERFORMANCE OF THE TRANSISTOR, BY REACHING THE COLLECTOR EASIER. THOUGH BY MAKING THE OPPOSITE GEOMETRY WE DESTROY THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS TRANSISTOR. SO THE APPLICABILITY OF AMPERE LOW EXPLAINS THE DYNANICS AND THE CHOSEN GEOMETRY OF TRANSISTORS. THE FORCE LOW OF AMPERE IS EQUIVALENT TO THE LORENTZ LOW IN MANY CASES AND FOR THOSE CASES THE TWO LOWS ARE NOT EQUIVALENT, THE AMPERE LOW IS THE ONLY VALID.
IT REMAINS TO BE EXPLAINED WHY THIS LOW HAS DISAPPEARED FROM THE TAUGHT ELECTRODYNAMICS AND PHYSICS. ARE THERE SOME STRATEGIC AND UNKNOWN CONSEQUENCES OF THIS LOW?:. THE ANSWER OF THIS QUESTION IS YES. HOWEVER. WE SHALL SEE THE HIDDEN CONSEQUENCE IN THE FUTURE....
CONTINUOUS....
No comments:
Post a Comment